Showing posts with label Manu Gopinath. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Manu Gopinath. Show all posts

Sunday, 25 November 2012

Bibliography



"Art Spiegelman Criticism." Enotes (2004): n. pag. Web. <http://www.enotes.com/art-spiegelman-criticism/spiegelman-art>.

Chute, Hilary. "Why Mice?" New York Review of Books. N.p., 20 Oct. 2011. Web. 23 Oct. 2012. <http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2011/oct/20/why-mice/>.

Cooke, Rachel. "Art Spiegelman: 'Auschwitz Became for Us a Safe Place'" The Observer. Guardian News and Media Limited, 23 Oct. 2011. Web. 17 Oct. 2012. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/oct/23/art-spiegelman-maus-25th-anniversary>.

Kois, Dan. "The Making of Maus." Sunday Book Review. The New York Times, 2 Dec. 2011. Web. 18 Oct. 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/books/review/the-making-of-maus.html?ref=artspiegelman&_r=2&>.

"Maus." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation Inc., n.d. Web. 20 Oct. 2012. <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maus>.

Perry, James. "Prisoner on the Hell Planet." Web log post. Smitten. N.p., 24 July 2011. Web. 15 Oct. 2012. <http://jperrryy.wordpress.com/2010/07/24/prisoner-on-the-hell-planet/>.

Saturday, 24 November 2012

Graphic Analysis



A piece of the book that really hit me personally was the “prisoner on the Hell Planet” sequence. It is in chapter 5 on page 102. It is sort of a departure or escape from the general narrative so far which focuses on the father, Vladek. This section of the book is very Art centric.
The content was very strong, as is the rest of the book. It is regarding Art’s mental health issues surrounding his mother’s suicide. The reason it hit me was because of the main focus of the story, in this case Art, and then the style.
What made me really enjoy Prisoner on the Hell Planet was that it told me a lot more about Art Spiegelman, not just as a character in the overall narrative, but also as an artist. To learn more of his back-story, about his personal struggles in his own life really helped me sympathize more with him and the inner demons he has been battling. It made me realize that pain was something the Spiegelman’s had become accustomed to. It made him seem kind of a tragic character, with an innate, intrinsic sense of sadness about him, which made him seem like a regular, everyday human being. That made me believe the story all the more. How honest and forthcoming he was about his own mental health issues, and his own coldness towards his mother is not a flattering image of the artist, but it is honest, and it gave credibility to the rest of the work.
Maus is generally told with very gritty and crude drawings. It suits the story and it actually adds to the enjoyment of the tale in general. I found the style in the Prisoner on the Hell Planet to be gritty and moody, but more developed. It is clearly a bit of a departure from the rest of the story. As it is meant to be. It really suits the flashback sensibility of the scene and it made me realize that Art Spiegelman IS a really good artist and that the crude drawings in the rest of the book are that way by choice. As an artist, it makes me appreciate the work and the author a lot more to know that they are not copping out. This is a conscious decision in order to evoke a certain emotion in the audience. This section definitely taught me something and I really felt the weight of it. 

Prisoner on the Hell Planet
http://jperrryy.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/prisoner2.jpg





Manu

Tuesday, 6 November 2012

Holocaust Paintings

Reading up on the Holocaust and finishing Maus reminds me of some paintings I did. The Holocaust obviously inspired these.






by Manu Gopinath

Characterization



The Characterization of the elements of the Holocaust plays a pivotal role in the appeal and enjoyment of the book. It strengthens the overall plot and adds a certain level of depth to the story as well as enhancing the audience’s comprehension of the conflict as a whole.
                There are three main aspects of the book that are worth analyzing when trying to better understand Spiegelman’s characterization choices. The first is the Holocaust as a deadly mouse trap. This will lead directly into the second which is the characterization of the major players in the overarching story; that is the Jews as Mice and the Nazis as Cats. Lastly, it is worth paying attention to Spiegelman’s characterization of his father Vladek as a sufferer, survivor, a father, and as a man.
                In an interview with Hilary Chute of the New York Review of Books blog, Spiegelman sheds some light on these aspects. He explains that during his research for the project, he learned that a gas called Zyklon B is what was used inside the gas chambers at Auschwitz and other places where this horrible act was taking place. The interesting footnote of this is that Zyklon B is a pesticide that is made to kill vermin, such as roaches and fleas. He immediately understood that there was a massive dehumanizing of people in order to carry out Hitler’s killing project. [1]

Gas Chambers at Auschwitz

                This dehumanizing directly carries into his characterization of the people as animals instead of humans. It was a very conscious choice and not one he fell up accidentally. He initially had planned to use the cat and mouse paradigm of oppression in a commentary about racism in America towards African Americans. However, upon reflecting on the analogy as well as his own life, family history, and especially childhood nightmares where Nazis chase Jews, he felt he had stumbled upon a much more compelling, and honest story. His research on this idea led him to German documentaries from the 1940’s where Jews in the Ghetto are depicted as swarming rats, with title cards literally reading “vermin of mankind”.  Spiegelman then understood how useful the depiction would be. The Jews being portrayed and characterized as mice while being preyed upon by the German cats, who also in real life possessed unbelievable power over their victims, would strike at the heart of the matter.


                Perhaps the most interesting part of the book is Vladek, Spiegelman’s father. He grounds the story in reality as the back story of his experiences during the Holocaust can seem quite otherworldly at times due to the horrific circumstances. Spiegelman’s characterization of his father gives complete legitimacy to the story as there is no sugar coating or saintly hood that he tries to apply to his father. Rather, there is sort of a blemish added to Vladek’s personality. In the book, Vladek demonstrates what clearly seems to be some personal prejudices towards African Americans. Ironically, he cannot draw a connection between his attitudes and the horrors that he himself witnessed and experienced in Nazi-Germany. This adds immense believability to the character. In an article in The Observer , author Rachel Cooke states about Spiegelman that “…his absolute refusal to sentimentalize or sanctify the survivor, in this case, his father…but unimaginable suffering, Spiegelman wants us to understand, doesn’t make a person better; it just makes them suffer.” [2] Spiegelman shows that even though his father is a sufferer, and a survivor, he was still just a man, with flaws, and their relationship was strained and complicated. The undertone of the story is an overwhelming tension that lies between Art and his father and it makes the book much more human, much more believable, and a much more compelling read. 

by Manu Gopinath


[1] Chute, Hilary. "Why Mice?" New York Review of Books. N.p., 20 Oct. 2011. Web. 23 Oct. 2012. <http://www.nybooks.com/blogs/nyrblog/2011/oct/20/why-mice/>.
[2] Cooke, Rachel. "Art Spiegelman: 'Auschwitz Became for Us a Safe Place'" The Observer. Guardian News and Media Limited, 23 Oct. 2011. Web. 17 Oct. 2012. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/oct/23/art-spiegelman-maus-25th-anniversary>.

Monday, 5 November 2012

Media Appearances


               After the release of Maus I, Art Spiegelman became a sort of unlikely celebrity. As Spiegelman confessed to reporter Rachel Cooke in an interview with The Observer “I was unsure how to proceed. Could I follow it up with Maus II? The fact that so much terror and sadness and death was such a success sort of gave me the bends.”[1]
                As he ventured out into the public forum, there were large “Shouting matches with the audience” where he was unable to say anything about Israel. The people were just crazy in a way. The fallout clearly hit a political nerve with several people, many being moved to discuss unresolved disputes between Israel and its highly volatile neighborhood.  These highly serious and culturally motivated dialogues held so passionately with many Jews did not come so easily to Spiegelman. He was Jewish really only in origin. He was, in his own words a “rootless cosmopolitan”. He felt no real tie to these issues. He molded his own microcosm with the soup of cultures that metropolitan New York would have to offer. He was quite light hearted and generally unmotivated to pursue the passions and tensions that came so easily to “Jews that embraced the parts of Jewishness that were embraceable.”[2]
                Recently in 2012, the Highschool that he attended as a youth installed a glass paneled mural of Spiegelman’s. This is specifically at the High School of Art and Design building in Manhattan, from which he graduated.

Art and his wife, Francoise.

by Manu Gopinath


[1] Cooke, Rachel. "Art Spiegelman: 'Auschwitz Became for Us a Safe Place'" The Observer. Guardian News and Media Limited, 23 Oct. 2011. Web. 17 Oct. 2012. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/oct/23/art-spiegelman-maus-25th-anniversary>.
[2] Cooke, Rachel. "Art Spiegelman: 'Auschwitz Became for Us a Safe Place'" The Observer. Guardian News and Media Limited, 23 Oct. 2011. Web. 17 Oct. 2012. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/oct/23/art-spiegelman-maus-25th-anniversary>.

Reception and Reviews of the Work Part II

             When Maus by Art Spiegelman came out it was a massive success, both critically and commercially. While an overwhelming majority of the feedback was positive, there was some backlash from releasing a book with this sort of subject matter. Spiegelman recounted some of these responses that were not as favorable:

“Don’t you think that a comic book about Auschwitz is in bad taste?” one angry reporter asked him when the book was published in Germany. “No,” Spiegelman replied, “I thought Auschwitz was in bad taste.”[1]
On the other hand, the book was such a hit that at some points Spiegelman was accused of having only one book in his repertoire that was worth publishing, or as the music business would title it, he was accused of being a One Hit Wonder. Spiegelman himself goes on to admit that in his career since Maus II, he has mostly been “…trying to wriggle out from under my own achievement.”[2] Nonetheless, the immense success of the work has allowed him more privileges as an artist/author than punishments. He has a level of independence that is cherished and relished in the art industry. As he puts it in an interview with the Observer “Maus does well enough that I don't have to chase every ambulance. I've no need of advances, and so on. That should give me incredible license."[3]


[1] Kois, Dan. "The Making of Maus." Sunday Book Review. The New York Times, 2 Dec. 2011. Web. 18 Oct. 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/books/review/the-making-of-maus.html?ref=artspiegelman&_r=2&>.
[2] Kois, Dan. "The Making of Maus." Sunday Book Review. The New York Times, 2 Dec. 2011. Web. 18 Oct. 2012. <http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/04/books/review/the-making-of-maus.html?ref=artspiegelman&_r=2&>.
[3] Cooke, Rachel. "Art Spiegelman: 'Auschwitz Became for Us a Safe Place'" The Observer. Guardian News and Media Limited, 23 Oct. 2011. Web. 17 Oct. 2012. <http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2011/oct/23/art-spiegelman-maus-25th-anniversary>.